Lisa Turpin (torture) wrote,
@ 2008-01-28 20:57:00

28 MAY

I made this to help Anthony work on his aim. I'm making a wallet next.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

science
2008-01-29 05:54 am UTC (link)

Excellent. I've sketched out a small diagram of what might actually occur during the test:

1. The test subject - you
2. Me, The experimental variable.
3. Lisa's target, the control.
4. The tool we'll be using to help you in this test - a standard regulation dodgeball.
5. Since myself and Lisa's makeshift target will be standing next to one another you have to pick which one you think you could most successfully hit with a dodgeball.
6. I am clothed entirely from start to finish.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 05:57 am UTC (link)
	Wow. That's a really interesting diagram. But I can't hit you with a ball! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 05:59 am UTC (link)
	Why not? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 06:02 am UTC (link)
	Because! You're...you know. You're not someone I could hit with a dodgeball. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 06:06 am UTC (link)
	So do you feel that your moral constraints make me an easier or more difficult target than the opposition? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 06:08 am UTC (link)
	More difficult. I could hit Macmillan, though. Because it would give me a supreme sense of satisfaction. Hitting you, on the other hand, well that would just make me feel bad. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 06:10 am UTC (link)
	Well. I was hoping for trying out the scientific process at least once more on my own before the term ended, but your answer is sufficient enough to draw a good enough conclusion. It's back to the drawing board. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 06:13 am UTC (link)
	Well. I could help you. With your drawing board. Unless it wasn't a literal drawing board, in which case I guess I could help you with your metaphorical drawing board. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 06:15 am UTC (link)
	I need a new hypothesis and things to test. Is there anything you've been wanting to scientifically prove lately? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 06:16 am UTC (link)
	Yes. That curse thing. You know. The Macbeth curse. I have to check my lights. Not that I'm worried about it or anything. Because it cannot possibly be real, am I right? I'm right, right? I knew it. Anyway. You could probably scientifically prove it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 06:23 am UTC (link)
	Of course! I'd be happy to disprove that the curse actually exists. What's wrong with your lights? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 06:24 am UTC (link)
	Nothing. It's just that one of them could fall at any moment. Or the sequence could somehow get messed up. Little things like that. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 06:27 am UTC (link)
	But you programed them correctly. I don't see how that would happen unless someone actually went in and played around with it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	toldstein 2008-01-29 06:29 am UTC (link)
	You're right. You're exactly right. I don't know what I was getting so worked up about. Ha! Well, good thing that's over with. I mean, imagine what would have happened had I actually gone to the auditorium to check on the lights. I would have been pretty embarrassed. Ha ha ha. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	science 2008-01-29 06:33 am UTC (link)
	I think Lisa and Mandy are in the auditorium anyway. So they'll keep a watch on things. Don't worry, your lights will be perfect. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status