cristallina (owllight) wrote,
@ 2008-06-15 19:55:00

List three (or more) of your characters, and I'll tell you how I would have played them, similar or different.

	dreamandawake 2008-06-16 02:19 am UTC (link)
	Charlemagne Tiger Lily Simone Lovely (Reply to this)(Thread)

owllight
2008-06-21 03:53 pm UTC (link)

Charlemagne: I would have made him more arrogant, more concerned with HIS glory than with bettering the world. Since I already have someone with a hero complex and all :P

Tiger Lily: I probably never would have thought to make her a stripper! I'd likely have made her a lot like Nesia - headstrong, kind of nasty, very curious and sort of a troublemaker.

Simone: I probably would have MEANT to make her like your Simone, but never in a million years would have been as successful. Simone is brilliant.

Lovely: Jesus god. I likely would have kept Lovecraft a boy, since I don't write girls well. He would have been gaunt and creepy, stared a lot, totally morbid of course. Fasincated with dead things. Similar to the short-lived Walpole I played, and certainly not as incredible and dynamic and insane as your Lovely.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	colourexplosion 2008-06-16 02:26 am UTC (link)
	Wendy John Juliet (Reply to this)(Thread)

owllight
2008-06-21 04:05 pm UTC (link)

Wendy: If I played Faulkner, he'd probably be Tennessee with a Napoleonic complex. Pissed off because he's short, and with a totally crippling alcohol problem.

John: I'd likely have played a very serious, very tightly laced Steinbeck. He would have been kind and very warm, but certainly have a lot of convictions about him. Probably would have been a socialist. Secretly would want to run off and join the circus.

Juliet: I'd likely have made her a spoiled brat set on self-destruct. Bored and rich, she'd do a lot of drugs and go to a lot of parties. She likely would be falling in love with just about every boy she sees, extremely foolish and unable to fend for herself.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	ow_mybrain 2008-06-16 02:36 am UTC (link)
	Anna Laura Charles Peter (Reply to this)(Thread)

owllight
2008-06-21 04:11 pm UTC (link)

Anna: I think I likely would have made her very similar to your Anna, really. Maybe just slightly less sweet, but just as defenseless - like a trembly little chihuahua that bites the hand that feeds it.

Laura: Oh Laura <3 I honestly don't know how I'd have made her any different, because Laura is so perfect. No joke.

Charles: Honestly, when I think of Charles Perrault, I don't think I've had made him very different from Hans. Possibly a darker, slightly more twisted version of him. Not so sweet, but still in a world of his own.

Peter: Jesus, Peter is perfect. I probably wouldn't have been able to play him so close to canon, really, because I'm so biased in favor of Wendy/Peter. And I'd likely have made him a little more unthinkingly cruel.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	derkins 2008-06-16 02:55 am UTC (link)
	Luke Alex Tink (Reply to this)(Thread)

owllight
2008-06-21 04:17 pm UTC (link)

Luke: I likely would have kept Plath a girl, but otherwise she would have been a lot like Luke - frail, very morbid and self-destructive. I like Luke way better than anything I would have played.

Alex: I think I would have made him slightly less abrasive, but still a brat in many ways. Pictures of Alexei Romanov make my heart hurt because I want to snuggle him, he looks so sweet and sad and ugh <3

Tink: I would have failed at playing Tink, because I'm always biased towards Wendy. I probably would have made her a vapid, evil bitch with no redeeming qualities at all!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	lemonadeandgin 2008-06-16 08:12 pm UTC (link)
	E. M. Forster Sappho William Shakespeare Oscar Wilde Heliogabalus (Reply to this)(Thread)

owllight
2008-06-21 04:26 pm UTC (link)

Forster: I have never read any Forster, and I don't know much about him, so I'm not sure exactly how I'd have taken him on. From what I know about him, I likely would have made him pretty gentle and very secretive, but perhaps not to the extreme that Morgan is. He'd be very willful, under his timid exterior.

Sappho: I probably would have made her fall in love with practically everyone she crosses paths with. I love that you made her a music teacher, I likely wouldn't have thought of bringing in the lyrical nature of her work!

Shakes: Um. Total drama queen. Kind of judgemental, very snarky, and yes - just extremely dramatic. Everything is life or death to him! He probably wouldn't have been nearly so loveable as Shakes. Really kind of annoying, actually.

Wilde: How on earth could my Wilde be near as charming as yours? Personality-wise, they'd likely have been similar, but I would never be able to pull it off even a fraction of how well you do.

Heliogabalus: Marcus is also such a perfect interpretation of Heliogabalus. Twisted and obsessive. I probably wouldn't have managed to make him so sympathetic though - just totally deranged!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	lastbeautifool 2008-06-18 12:13 am UTC (link)
	gabe poe hook (Reply to this)(Thread)

owllight
2008-06-21 04:31 pm UTC (link)

Gabe: How can I even go there, omg. Gabe has everything - the addictions, the regard for religion, the WOMBATS. Gabe is perfect and I'm sure anything I would have done with Rosetti would have paled in comparison. Times infinity.

Poe: Poe Poe Poe. I think perhaps I'd have made him a little more righteous, and with an affinity for science, particularly astronomy. Also, totally a creepsta when it comes to matters of the heart. Probably just really creepy and awkward in general.

Hook: I could never write him.... even a fraction of as well as you do. I'd have either made him totally unrealistically cruel, or I'd have made him too kind. He definitely wouldnt have been so drawing and.... UNF.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status