From a comment thread at Questioning Transphobia regarding a recent dustup elsewhere regarding the terms 'cissexual' and 'cisgendered', 2009-06-20 and 2009-06-30:
| sharav: | So, my latent chemist arises and wants to
suggest using the E-Z nomenclature rather than the
deprecated cis,trans system. so, if 'cis' is not
acceptable, perhaps one might prefer Z-sexual and
E-sexual ... or not ... |
| Ceri B.: | I'm willing to be either dextro- or levo-sexual, too. |
| z: | ...and describe poly relationships using the meth-/eth-/but-/prop- naming scheme? *ducks* |
Goddamn it, if I'm reading your blog, and there's a little
thingie at the end of an article that says "Comments", underlined,
in bright blue, looking for all the world like a, y'know,
fucking link, then I really do not think it is
unreasonable to control-click or right-click on that, select
"open in the damned background so I can read it later" off the
popup menu, and expect the comments to open in a background
tab and be waiting there when I get to them! So getting done
with the front page and going over to a comments tab to start
reading the feedback, and finding a fucking empty page
with "javascript:HaloScan('457154930130928681
| ← Previous day | (Calendar) | Next day → |