timelord8 (timelord8) wrote in ttooc,
@ 2010-01-12 20:32:00

In order to satisfy a Doctor Who plot point for my upcoming haltius I feel the need to introduce a secondary character. This is the watcher. He is a faceless silent glowing man. He needs to be killed off. Perhaps someone can mistake him for a white heartless? First come first serve. I want him dead.

(Post a new comment)

kiokushitaka
2010-01-13 04:23 am UTC (link)

I do not see other comments here, but please tell me you discussed this with a mod first before going ahead and posting in the main community? Since character death isn't something we have had to discuss before, and all that. I personally am not adverse to it, I like writing character death- it's interesting... just make sure you have permission from all the mods before doing something you're unsure of (which you clearly were since you posted this).

(Reply to this)(Thread)

strawberrytea
2010-01-13 04:30 am UTC (link)

I'm not adverse to it either. What I was adverse to is picking up characters for the sole reason of killing them off. HOWEVER on that note uh yeah I know it was discussed with D, but I was under a different impression about it I guess. I mean all I'm asking is if you want someone to come kill whatever off give us a little more to go off of. Humor us with a bit more detail maybe?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	hammerofjustice 2010-01-13 04:33 am UTC (link)
	Doctor-mun discussed it with me and the general idea is that this Watcher thing should be killed and it would cause the Doctor to regenerate more slowly. So when the Watcher is killed then the Master can just pop in and you know, off him. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	kiokushitaka 2010-01-13 04:33 am UTC (link)
	I'd also like to point out that white heartless look like mushrooms and tend to play games rather than fight, if memory serves. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	timelord8 2010-01-13 05:03 am UTC (link)
	never actually played kingdom harts. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	timelord8 2010-01-13 05:11 am UTC (link)
	the Watcher is a old plot device. he is a semi stable future regeneration sent back in time to make sure the doctor regenerates. if the watcher isent around the doctor wont regenerate as fast giving agetha time to stick him in the tardis. it fixes the problem of the master just waiting for him to regenerate then killing him again. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	strawberrytea 2010-01-13 05:23 am UTC (link)
	You're missing my point. If your goal is have that thing killed you need to give people more to go off than three mesley sentences. There is no motivation or anything for it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

timelord8
2010-01-13 05:35 am UTC (link)

I was trying to avoid posting my plans for killing the doctor all over the TTOOC. I see your point though. I'm sorry I didnt give him a plot but he really dosn't have one. there is no good reason for someone to kill him other than he looks strange or the killer likes killing people. thats why I phrased it the way I did. If you would rather, I could have him wander into Agathas lab and he can be killed by a rouge experiment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	assassino 2010-01-13 05:54 am UTC (link)
	We now have an assassino in our midst if you'd like to employ him~ Ezio can tell someone's an enemy via use of his Eagle's Vision (hostiles appear as red, allies as blue, targets as gold)... unless you must have The Master kill him, I do not know your plans with Master-mun. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	timelord8 2010-01-13 05:20 pm UTC (link)
	the watcher isn't a enemy. He is no threat to anyone. the master wouldn't kill a watcher because for all he knows the watcher is here to Observe him. so I need a third party to kindly do some unnecessary violence. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	kiokushitaka 2010-01-13 06:52 pm UTC (link)
	What d'you mean 'third party?' (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	timelord8 2010-01-14 01:24 am UTC (link)
	wellll... as I said in the post, first come first served. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	kiokushitaka 2010-01-14 02:20 am UTC (link)
	I guess the part I'm confused about is as follows; he needs to be killed, but seems to pose no threat. I'm confused as to why the Watcher needed to be brought in in the first place. oO;? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	timelord8 2010-01-14 02:26 am UTC (link)
	you know what? I'm sorry. He's dead and it wont happen again. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	kiokushitaka 2010-01-14 02:29 am UTC (link)
	It's not a big deal, promise! I didn't want to make it seem like it wasn't allowed, I was just not following. D:! I hope I don't seem like a big mean mod or anything! ;; (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

timelord8
2010-01-14 02:47 am UTC (link)

I obsess about doctor who cannon all the time. Its my life. 26 seasons of the original series 4 separate book contracts 3 different comic book licencings, the new series the movie and 25 years of audio books. I could spend a life time and not experience all of it. I try my hardest to keep details in check when the writers themselves contradict them. I wanted to give a logical cannon reason for delayed regeneration, that's why I needed the watcher. their are other ways of achieving the same thing. he could be druged, or find a magical item but I chose the watcher because he feels less like a deus ex machina. he has precedent in the show.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	kiokushitaka 2010-01-14 02:50 am UTC (link)
	See, you should have said this first when we asked up there. points I'm not as, uh, dedicated to Doctor Who as you. I started with nine and worked from there, and have no interest in watching the old series (I know, I'm such a bad fan) so... yeah... but I do have a wiki page open so I don't seem like a total moron. (Reply to this)(Parent)

scribbld is part of the horse.13 network
Design by Jimmy B.
Logo created by hitsuzen.
Scribbld System Status